GCF Learn Free

I came across this blog just recently even though I had visited its parent website many times over the past year or so.  It is aptly named - learn free.  Having worked for Goodwill early in my career, I can attest to the good work that they do and their ability to keep simplicity of focus in an increasingly frenetic and complicated global political economy.  The Goodwill Community Foundation's Learn Free website is just an extention of that focused mission.   I had the pleasure of introducing my folks to this website as they have just recently embarked on a mission of their own to embrace technology and the benefits that it can have in keeping in touch both with the world and with those important to us in this world. 

Much on blogging, technology and other things

As much as I know, I know this much: the more that I know, the more I know that I don’t know much.

I was trying to put my cumulative learning in this grand experiment into a single phrase and this is what I came up with.  Talk about incoherent intelligence.

Those that have followed my blogging from the get-go will recall that my idea was to explore the medium as a tool for critical reflection and learning.  Previously, my reflections in any learning event were contained in a journal of some sort.  Most often it was saved in a folder in my computer but sometimes it was saved in the messiest of file cabinets: my brain.  Sharing my reflections was limited to my instructor, my classmates, my colleagues and (God bless them) my family.  So, blogging would open up the audience considerably.  Or so I thought.  Turns out that blogging is more than just throwing some thoughts down on a webpage, adding some hyperlinks, the odd picture or video, and waiting for the responses of the masses.  Apparently, if you blog it, they won’t necessarily view it, read it, and comment on it.  In fact, most won’t even know that it’s there. No, you actually have to be equally adept at marketing your ideas.  Posting on other blogs, telling friends, colleagues, and acquaintances about your blog are just a few activities that you need to do in order to get readership.  You’re not just the author and idea-man; you are the publisher and ad-man.  Problem is, I’m more of an idea-man than an ad-man.   

So, in terms of obtaining feedback from the masses, making my blog a truly interactive critically reflective endeavour, I kind of didn’t succeed.  Actually, in the spirit of true unvarnished critical reflection, my experiment was a failure.  But it wasn’t an unmitigated disaster.  Let me explain why.

When I first decided to blog I made the decision knowing that I had some experience with technology.  I had read blogs, used the internet quite frequently for research purposes and had taken one online course. Heck, I even participated in a couple of social media sites (although my network resembled more of a campfire circle than a complex web).  But it was that most recent experience with an online course and my introduction to a learning management system that piqued my interest in technology and its use in developing and expanding learning.  So it was with this background that I approached my blog.  Eager to experiment but a little nervous about what I might experience.

Even though my blog entries didn’t get the engaged response that I’d hoped for, I did get some readership.  Or at least some viewers.   I can’t be sure that they read anything due to the lack of comments but they at least took a look.  And, for those that didn’t stumble upon my blog using the random selection tool, something that I said drew them to my pages.  This in and of itself was a success.  It gave me a viewership that encouraged me to continue writing.  My viewership also made me conscious about the quality of my writing as well. Now, I don’t just mean ensuring that my writing was free of spelling and grammatical errors and had a good flow, either.  I’m talking about the content, the ideas.  In a traditional journaling exercise in any course that I’ve taken, you typically have to complete a journal entry every week and submit it.  This structure sometimes means that you search for some artificial insight, some saccharine “eureka” moment (I prefer that term to “aha” – that’s just sooo 2010).  Having a viewership meant that I felt compelled to write something of substance, even if it was small, and it meant that I went days, sometimes weeks, without posting.  I simply didn’t have anything worthwhile to say.  I also had a number of unfinished blogs on the desktop.  Ideas that were fleeting, lacking the substance that I initially thought they had as I tried to develop them. This compulsion along with the ability of the medium to accept and assimilate other tools, such as hyperlinks and videos, also meant that my posts were often more creative, involving more research, in effect, more critical reflection.

While on the one hand my posts were more thought out and involved more critical reflection as a direct result of the medium, they also suffered a bit as well.  Not only did I reflect upon the substantiveness of my posts, but I also reflected on their legacy.  The possibility that anyone could read my posts brought with it a weight of responsibility.  I was very conscious of the fact that my posts could be read by anyone.  My reflections upon my learning, how I was openly applying learned concepts to my life meant that those in my life could be brought unwittingly into this public spectacle.  As such, I don’t think that I was as fulsome in my reflection as I would have been had it been off-line.  The extent of my confession was hampered by the lack of a screen and a sacred vow of secrecy, you might say.

So, my blogging experience wasn’t a failure, especially in terms of my learning about the strengths and limitations of the medium.  It gave me the kick in the ass that I hoped it would and in more ways than I had expected.  It also allowed me to explore the tools that are available via the world wide web and what they could mean to my practice and the role of adult education in the global political economy.   

55 minutes of the final hour: Post-modernism invades the classroom

“There are those who see critical questioning as always leading to a relativistic freeze that prevents them from ever making full-blooded firm commitments” Stephen Brookfield in Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher.

I came across this little nugget late last night (or was it early this morning?), after posting my last blog.  You’ll recall in that post that I explored the “intellectual incoherence” that is a hallmark and danger of post-modernism.  We spend too much time thinking about, defining and discussing all of the complexities and intricacies of the world’s problems and in the face of all of that complexity, we simply cannot act. Global death by theory, you might say.  And it’s true, isn’t it?  We like to wrap ourselves in our analysis and our theory as if they were warm blankets.  They’re comfortable, reassuring, keeping out the harsh reality of what might happen, could happen, definitely will happen.  And, they do a pretty good job of covering our ass, too.

Brookfield goes on to say that, “from this viewpoint, critically reflective teachers are weak-kneed equivocators, always able to see two sides of an issue and therefore unable to have confidence in their own choices”.  So, not only are we, as a society, unable to tackle the most pressing developmental problems of our time because we are trapped in a clingy web of stasis, but even in the classroom, wherever that may be, we, as teachers, can’t make a decision or move an idea forward because we are too entangled in our journaling or our critical conversation circles.  So, if what Finger and Asun suggest is right, that adult education is the way to “learn our way out” of our developmental quagmire but adult educators are “weak-kneed equivocators”, then I guess we’re really screwed, huh?  Well, not really.

You’ll also recall that I suggested in my last post that technology could play a role in learning our way out, as evidenced in the Occupy Movement and the Arab Spring.  It serves to bring people together, clarify oppression and facilitate action.  What Brookfield suggests is that teachers who engage in critical reflection are not weak.  Rather, they have strength in their “commitment to people, beliefs, structures, movements or ideals and an acknowledgment that at some time in the future, [their] experience might lead [them] to amend or even abandon such commitments”.   Without the adult educators to guide the gathering of people, help clarify the oppression and coordinate the action, all the while through a critically reflective lens to ensure democracy in the ‘classroom’, the technology is just another bulletin board riddled with incoherent messages.  So, while teachers may spend 55 minutes of the final hour, as Einstein suggested, contemplating the problem, they are committed to praxis and engage in it just the same.

Beyond post-modernism: From throwing up our hands to throwing down the gauntlet

Created in Wordle by me

Finger and Asun talk about the post-modern world in which we live.  They refer to it as a juncture of sorts.  Along the development road, we have left our modernist way of travel and we are reflecting upon our attempts to bring the lesser-developed along for the ride with a critical eye.  It’s through this reflection that we are coming to realize that trying to bring others into the capitalist fold, relying solely on capitalist forces to do so, has been an abysmal failure. What have we learned from the modernization experiment?  Capitalist forces serve the hegemony of the dominant class, the corporate class.  The inevitable facelessness of multi-nationalism has left a wake of ecological degradation and destruction, societal inequity and despair, and a convoluted and complex global political economy that more resembles a house of cards than a solid base for growth and prosperity.  It would seem that the current state of affairs in the world bears out Finger and Asun’s arguments.  And it’s this last conclusion, the tremulous house of cards on the brink of collapse, which is a key hangover feature that leads us into the post-modern era.  It’s also the most troubling characteristic and the single point of attack for adult education, Finger and Asun assert, if the new adult education is to become a force of reason and change in the new global political economy. 

Now, Finger and Asun don’t spend too much time focusing on the characteristics of the post-modern era that make it unique to any other in our history.  Much of the scholarly writing on this has been largely speculative up until this point in time and, although much has been written about it in recent years, I would suspect that it is largely still speculative and, I would argue, reactive.  So, after some encouragement from one of my classmates in response to post in her seminar discussion (thanks Colleen), I’ll attempt to provide my perspective here.

When I read about post-modernism and Finger and Asun's description of it as "intellectual incoherence" and a "fragmentation of social and individual life", I immediately thought of adult education as a natural response.  I think that at its core, adult education seeks to clarify concepts through social interaction.  I think that what we are seeing in the technological realm is a natural evolution of post-modernism, perhaps a post-post-modernism.  The rise of social media and the efforts made to bring people together on a global scale through this medium is evidence of this evolution.  I think that the Occupy movement is an example of this evolution.  I would also argue that much of the protests in the middle east were examples of this evolution as well. 

I recently attended some training on eLearning.  Well, it was billed as eLearning but the trainer, a true androgogue (and I mean that in the most sincere and positive way), spent the time allowing us to explore technology that was free or virtually free via the World Wide Web.  Each site that we visited, each application that we downloaded and explored was accompanied with the questions “How do you think this would be of use to you and work that you do within the social services?”, and “How do you think this would be of use to those that you serve?”  Now, I won’t suggest that each application or website was revolutionary for social service delivery or our clients, but most were at the very least helpful if not extraordinary (evident by the number of times that my jaw dropped and I muttered, “Coooooool”).  But, what struck me as we discussed the merits and limitations of what we were tinkering with was how much we have advanced in the past 15 years in terms of our relationship with technology and its role in how we relate to each other and our world.  So, while the post-modern era is delocalized, fragmented, complex, and contradictory with an eroded body politic, it is not necessarily going to result in a global throwing-up of hands in the air, a collective sigh of resignation and an apathetic chorus of, “Well, what can you do?”  It may just be that the way we relate, gather, and educate to liberate is changing and the technology that many say serves to isolate us will in fact bring us together and serve to facilitate our efforts to “learn our way out”.

If you want a snapshot of the growth and enormity social media, check out this video.  It's definitely got a corporate feel and agenda, but I think that you can imagine the implication for adult education.

Talking with books

Well, I have finished all of my readings for my two courses (cue the Peanuts theme music and begin dancing).  You’ll recall in an earlier post that I lamented on my slow reading ability.  The concept of speed reading is so far out of reach for me, so foreign a concept as to be almost magical.  When I see people skim through a text and give a cogent recollection of its meaning shortly thereafter, I find it to be as plausible an explanation that they absorbed the written words through some sort of neuropathic osmosis as opposed to actually reading them.  Like the words leapt off of the page and were sucked into their cranium through some sort of Dyson-designed literary wind tunnel technology.  I just don’t get it and I don’t think that I ever will.  I’ve learned a few tricks to speed up my reading, but I’m still slow. Painfully, sharp-stick-in-the-eye slow.  But I did get all of my reading done.  All of it.  All four books.  In less than 12 weeks.    And, I read a significant number of journal articles on top of the required reading.  So, you might have guessed that I’m pretty proud of myself.  And I’m okay with being a slow reader, I think. I spend a lot of time in critical contemplation upon my reading, remaking my own theory in the face of other.  I think that contributes to my slowness.  And, I think that that is okay.

Brookfield writes about having a conversation with books.  The more engaged conversations are earmarked by underlines, highlights, dog-eared pages, notes in the margins and broken spines – in the books, I mean (God, if reading were that painful, I think that I would have given up long ago!).  I’ve had some engaging conversations these last few months - with all of the books that I have read.  At times the conversations have become quite heated.  I’ll admit to throwing down a book in frustration a time or two.  At other times I have scrambled frantically, feverishly flipping through the pages in a book to recall a conversation that we had at some point in time that had only now made sense to me and developed meaning.  Indeed I think that it would be fair to say that I even developed relationships with my books.  They challenged me and affirmed me.  They gave me confidence and kicked me in the stomach (not that I’ve ever had a relationship with someone who literally kicked me in the stomach – well except for that kid in my neighbourhood back when I was 7, but he wasn’t much of a friend anyway).  So I am glad to have “met” my books, as Brookfield suggests.  And I am glad that our initial conversations are done and they were most fruitful.  I know that I’ll go back to converse with them in the remaining weeks of my current courses and likely again and again in the future.

On developing and facilitating an online, asyncronous seminar

During the week of October 2 to 8, 2011, I facilitated an online, asynchronous seminar, with a group of my classmates as participants.  The focus of the seminar was a chapter from within Finger and Asun’s book Adult Education at the Crossroads: Learning Our Way Out.  The chapter that I chose was titled “Marxist Adult Education: Democratic Centralism or Multiple Paths to the Right Solution”.  Pretty heady title. 

So, what was my rationale for choosing this particular chapter?  Having little prior academic experience in political science, I am nevertheless keenly interested in local, provincial and national politics and have been an avid consumer of political media for a number of years.  My political leanings tend to be more to the socialist left due in no small part to my vocation in the social services.  With this in mind, a chapter that dealt with Marxism and the opportunity to delve deeper into this school of thought and how this thinking has informed and influenced adult education globally, was hard to pass up.  Further, the opportunity to learn more about Paulo Freire, “one of the most influential educationists of the twentieth century” (Mayo, 2010, p. 31) was equally hard to pass up. 

The current Occupy Movement and the growing interest and attention given to inequality in the distribution of wealth and opportunity in society, further fuelled my interest and provided a real world, present day context from which to explore the readings.  In an article in  Finance & Development, Branco Milanovic, Lead Economist in the World Bank research group and author of the recent book The Haves and the Have-Nots: A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality, states that “income inequality has been on the rise—or stagnant at best—in most countries since the early 1980’s”.  He further states that while global inequality has reached a plateau and actually decreased in recent years, this is due in large part to the growing economies of China and India.  This does not necessarily mean that the gap between the richest and poorest in the world’s population is decreasing overall.  And, even if this trend continues the issue of inequality and all of the social ills that it represents will not simply go away.     

I think that the growing inequality in today’s society demands Marxist thinking and its derivatives, critical theory and critical pedagogy, in the analysis of society and development, how we relate to each other and our environment on a global scale.  Further, Freire’s work on “the collective dimension of learning” and the grassroots approach of Participatory Action Research (another key subject area in the chapter) provide useful pedagogical tools to “transform sociopolitical conditions” (Finger & Asun, 2001, p. 86). But that’s enough about my rationale for choosing the chapter that I chose.  On to my seminar… 

I crafted my lesson plan around the goal that at the end of the seminar learners would be able to draw the connection between Marxism and critical pedagogy and demonstrate an understanding of Paulo Freire’s Liberation Pedagogy and Participatory Action Research (PAR).  To support this goal, I created a presentation that employed a mix of graphic and textual components to synthesize these three themes from the reading.  Embedded within the presentation were three activities to engage learners in further exploration of the three themes.

In the first activity, learners were asked to view a video of U.S. Senate candidate, Elizabeth Warren, speaking to a small group of people.  Learners were then asked to think like a Marxist and a critical theorist/pedagogue and comment on the politician’s speech.  The idea of this exercise was to encourage learners to get into the mindset and philosophy of Marxism and offer their perspective rooted in critical theory.  While most learners were able to draw upon the readings, only one was able to really articulate that the politician was engaged in critical pedagogy. 

In the second activity, learners were asked to reflect upon a time when they felt liberated through education.  They were then asked to relate this experience to elements of Freire’s model of liberation pedagogy.  The genesis of the idea for this activity came from Bookfield’s writings on the value of autobiography in Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher (1995, p. 49); the idea being that reflecting on our experiences as learners would form a personal connection with Freire’s theory and lead to further understanding.  This exercise seemed difficult for some learners and easier for others.  Some of the experiences that were disclosed were extremely personal, laden with emotions, and left me feeling as though my experiences didn’t quite measure up.  If I felt this way, then surely other learners felt the same.

In the last activity I posed the same open-ended question that Finger and Asun posed at the end of the chapter: “can Participatory Action Research be applied in contexts other than agricultural and developing societies?” (p. 94).  The idea behind this exercise was to encourage the critical thinking discussed by the authors earlier in the chapter.  I knew when I crafted this activity that follow-up material would be required because of the expansive nature of the PAR approach, its many iterations and interpretations. Consequently, I offered up some further research that I did on PAR closer to home, in a more urban environment.  This seemed to spark learners’ imaginations and contributed to the level of discourse. 

Overall, I felt that the seminar was successful.  Measured against the learning outcomes, I felt that the discussion demonstrated the understanding that learners were developing of Marxist theory and its relation to critical theory and pedagogy, Freire’s liberation pedagogy, and Participatory Action Research.  The discussion seemed to flow freely; learners generally posted their thoughts with little prompting or encouragement from me.  Further, my interjections throughout the week’s discussion did not seem to hinder participation.  Rather, my follow-up questions, posts and comments, seemed to enhance participation and discourse.  

In the presentation and in the summary of the weeks’ discussions, I provided my classmates with a hyperlink to an online survey that I had developed using FluidSurveys.  This was my first time using an online survey tool and this one in particular was easy to use and flexible enough to allow me to obtain some quality feedback on the presentation, the activities and my facilitation.  What my classmates reported, supported my own observations.  All respondents indicated that the presentation enhanced their understanding of the readings and that the activities were challenging or somewhat challenging, promoting discussion and reflection.  A couple of respondents commented positively regarding the use of video and graphics in the presentation and activities.  All respondents stated that the facilitation struck a good balance between letting the discussion unfold and offering timely comments and questions that enhanced learning.   One respondent commented that they had difficulty coming up with a personal experience with liberation through education. 

So what did I learn from my experience and what does it mean for me as an adult educator?  This was my second attempt facilitating an online seminar in an asynchronous fashion.  In this sophomore experience, I was able to draw upon more resources to fully take advantage of the platform and really engage learners.  The use of video, graphics, and hyperlinks to other online resources promoted a dynamic environment for learning.  This is something that I will definitely build upon in future experiences.  That said, I believe that there were some elements to the activities that required more thought and could have been tweaked to further promote critical discourse throughout the week.

In the first activity, my phrasing of the question was, “What might someone with a Marxist perspective/ a critical theorist say….”  This did not effectively encourage learners to get into the mindset of a Marxist or a critical theorist.  Rephrasing it to say something like, “You are a Marxist political thinker/critical theorist attending this speech.  What might you say…”, might have resulted in more learners providing responses that were more than a regurgitation of the readings.  Further, I think that such an approach may have been more interesting and fun.

In the second activity, I neglected to fully anticipate the emotional component of asking learners to reflect upon and share a moment of liberation linked with education.  In some instances, learners were able to share deeply emotional experiences and in others the experiences were somewhat superficial.  Brookfield (1995) says that “some awareness of how students are experiencing learning is the foundational, first-order knowledge we need to do good work as teachers” (p. 94).  Reflecting upon my experience with this activity, I realize that I had no real idea about how learners were experiencing this particular piece of learning.  I hadn’t gotten inside their heads so that I could better anticipate their reaction to this activity.  I think that in some instances, learners were intimidated by the question and by the responses of those that shared deeply personal experiences of emancipation.  In the future, I will attempt different approaches to learn about the participants prior to crafting a learning activity (e.g. through reviewing their biographies, conducting a pre-seminar survey, etc.).

This seminar was an excellent opportunity to further develop my skills in online, asynchronous learning development and facilitation.  It was also an excellent opportunity to learn more about the Marxist school of thought, Freire’s work, and their implications for society and adult education in the present day.  Although I was able to further exploit the potential of an online environment, I was also reminded that a well designed learning event also requires considerable thought into the intent and potential implications of specific activities.  I was also reminded of the importance of getting inside the heads of learners in preparation for a learning event.   The learning that I gained from this seminar will serve me well in designing and delivering learning events in the future.

Clarifying theories

courtesy of fotosoup

I have neglected my writing some, in these last few weeks.  But life has been busy of late.  After facilitating an online seminar (more on this in a later post) and struggling with a bout of food poisoning (damn you, Dagwood!), I took off for the Great White North for an extended weekend of theorizing.  Say what?  Theorizing?  That doesn't sound like too much fun.  Let me explain.

hooks talks about finding “a place of sanctuary in theorizing, in making sense out of what was happening” (p. 61).  She also talks about the influence of Paulo Freire and the Vietnamese Buddhist monk, Thich Nhat Hanh on her life and work.  The former I have talked about at some length in a prior post.  In relation to the latter, she says that he “offered a way of thinking about pedagogy that emphasized wholeness, a union of mind, body and spirit” (p. 14).  Here’s a quote from Thich Nhat Hanh that hooks references in her book:  “The practice of a healer, therapist, teacher or any helping professional should be directed toward his or herself first, because if the helper is unhappy, he or she cannot help many people”. 

Like hooks, I have often found “sanctuary in theorizing”, inwardly reflecting upon what has been happening around me, to those around me, to myself and my role in all of it; how does it relate to what I know, what I’ve read, what I’m learning.  And as a seasoned social service worker, I know the value of what Thich Nhat Hanh speaks.  Helper, help thyself.  However, I also know that my ability to direct my practice inward is often hampered by the incessant buzz of white noise that the busyness of life projects.  Being a displaced northerner, I have always found solace and sanctuary in the outdoors, particularly the north. 

Now, I’m not talking about tromping off into the wilderness and cutting myself off from reality for an extended period of time, although I have done that and often find myself longing for that.  What I’m talking about is that moment when the cool fall air picks up through the soughing of the tamaracks in their golden glory, and you breathe in through your nose the scent of hay, decaying leaves and football.  The tip of your nose is cold and you revel in the warmth of your sweater, stamping feet, and outdoor work, cleaning up and preparing for snow.  That’s the moment when my brain and my soul feel as though they have been washed clean and theories become clear.    

Welcoming and painful

In Teaching to Transgress, bell hooks states that “making a classroom a democratic setting where everyone feels a responsibility to contribute is a central goal of transformative pedagogy" (p. 39).  The key word here is “responsibility”.  Hooks concedes that learning is not comfortable.   Having to confront deep-seeded assumptions is a difficult task.  In fact, it can be downright painful.

But the teacher’s role in this process is not that of nurse-maid, coddling her learners as they navigate through this uncomfortable, difficult and sometimes painful process of shedding the old and donning the new.  “Rather than focusing on issues of safety”, she writes, “I think that a feeling of community creates a sense that there is shared commitment and a common good that binds us” (p. 40).  It’s this sense of community that makes it possible for her students to share their thoughts and ideas.  So what if they don’t want to share and would prefer to engage in a more solitary analysis?  Well, apparently hooks doesn’t have much truck with that.  Students in hooks’s classes know that sharing is expected.  Not to give voice to your opinions is a bit of a cop out.  Learning just doesn’t happen if it isn’t given a voice.

Contrast hooks approach to that of Stephen Brookfield in Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher, and you can imagine that there was some bit of debate and comparative analysis in our online discussions this week.  No more or less respectful of the painful process of learning, Brookfield espouses getting in the heads of learners and reflecting on the dynamics of power in the classroom over the “give voice to your learning or get out” approach of hooks.   

But what are the implications for online learning?  On the one hand you could argue that the relative anonymity of the virtual environment would promote a safe environment.  This is often the case in other online environments outside the learning paradigm.  Case in point: social networking.  As too many of us know either personally or through observation of others, people will often post things on social networking sites that they would never announce in a face-to-face environment such as a party or other social gathering.  On the other hand, you could argue that the absence of visual cues makes it more difficult for a learner to judge how their honesty in a particular situation or on a particular subject will be perceived.  In any face-to-face classroom there is a feeling-out stage at the beginning of the learning event.  This may last from several minutes to several weeks, depending on the length of time that the learners will be together and each individual learner's stake in controlling the perceptions of others.  Often this is also influenced by the leader of the learning – the teacher, facilitator or whatever you want to call them.

I recall a professor in one of my core adult ed courses who spent some time talking about a "welcoming stance" with regard to pedagogical practice.  He referenced everything from signage (does it say “Welcome” or “All visitors must report to the office!”) to the actual body language of the professor, as being signposts that will indicate to a learner whether or not the environment is safe, welcoming of divergent views and diverse voices. He even went so far as to change his stance in the classroom as he lectured and led discussion.  Picture a man in his 50’s, with a white-haired buzz cut and an earring, dancing back and forth on the balls of his feet.  You can understand that, at the time, it reminded me of many football coaches that I had in my halcyon days explaining different types of stances for different positions, and downs and distances.  And although it was the subject of some chuckles during our smoke break that morning, I wonder how that class would have played out online had we not had the visual cues that he was giving and even the tone and passion in his voice as an indication that he really bought into the idea of a safe and welcoming environment and wasn’t just lecturing on it's importance.

Power and liberation

Power.  Even the word can bring about a visceral response in people.  We lust for it and we become intoxicated by it.  We also wield it and dominate with it. We can resist it and even struggle against it.  But can we deny it? Can it be ignored?

This week, in the two courses that I am currently taking, we have been learning about and discussing in some depth the relationship between power and adult education.  On a micro-level, we’ve looked at power and its influence on the teacher-learner relationship. And, on a more macro-level, we’ve looked at power and the role it plays society, how it influences development and participation in development.  Further, we’ve looked at the role of adult education in either contributing to inequality, both in the classroom and in society, or contributing to change and social justice. 

In one online discussion, there was a notion that power had no place in the classroom; societal constructs of 'class' shouldn’t be allowed admittance into the classroom.  Learning should be unencumbered by such assumptions.  I don’t think that it is ever possible to push power and it's constructs out of the classroom.  Nor do I think that we should want to.  Power should be welcomed, exposed, picked apart, disected, analyzed and named.  To do so brings the freedom of learning from the micro to the macro level.  It fulfills a higher purpose than just expanding one's mind.  Rather, it connects our personal emancipation to others.  I think that Paulo Freire would agree with me. 

For those of you from the adult ed world, you already know Mr. Freire.  For those of you who don’t, I’ll defer to bell hooks for an introduction:

Paulo was one of the thinkers whose work gave me a language.  He made me think deeply about the construction of an identity in resistance.  There was this one sentence of Freire’s that became a revolutionary mantra for me:  “We cannot enter the struggle as objects in order later to become subjects.”  Really it is difficult to find words adequate to explain how this statement was like a locked door – and I struggled within myself to find the key – and that struggle engaged me in a process of critical thought that was transformative.  This experience positioned Freire in my mind and heart as a challenging teacher whose work furthered my own struggle against the colonizing process – the colonizing mindset.” (hooks, 1994, p. 47)

Freire is the father of liberation pedagogy: the idea that education was about transformation from a state of voiceless “magical consciousness”, though a recognition of oppression, to finally landing in a state of critical consciousness.  Education was about leaving a state of despair and stagnation for a state of hope and action.  To him education without liberation was not and should not be possible.  I couldn’t agree more.    

A little inspiration

Today in the shower (where I do my best thinking, incidentally), I was listening to CBC Radio's Fresh Air with host, Mary Ito.  Just as I was I was getting a good steam going she introduced two "mature students".  This past week has been particularly trying in terms of keeping my commitment to my studies, and these folks were just the inspiration I needed.   Click here to listen.

Beautiful...

I wasn’t sure if I was going to share this right away or save it for next week, but I just can’t wait.  hooks talks about the classroom as an “exciting place, never boring” (p. 7, Teaching to Transgress).  I’ve had that experience in a number of classrooms over the years, particular as an adult learner and as a student in the adult ed program at Brock.  But since wading into the world of online learning, I’ve often wondered how you could achieve that level of excitement, particularly in a course that is delivered in an asynchronous format. In fact, when I read about excitement in hooks’s text, I wrote in the margin, “Yes, but how do you do this in an online environment?”.  Then, later on in the week, one of my fellow learners gave me an excellent example of the art of infusing excitement into the world of online learning. 

The assignment was to relate how a piece of poetry, a film, or any other form of art of our choosing had an impact on us and what it told about our persona.  I related my experience with the book Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, the film of the same name by Sean Penn and one of the songs from the soundtrack by Eddie Vedder (that may be a later post if I get around to it and/or if someone is interested).    

Waffa, a classmate of mine, posted a video link to Boonaa Mohammed reciting his poem, Beautiful.  I quickly read her post explaining what this said about her persona and moved on to the video link. I have to admit that I read Waffa’s post with only a passing interest but after I viewed the video, I felt like I needed to go back right away and read it again. You see after I viewed the video, I had this feeling of excitement that was building inside my gut.  A visceral response to what I had just witnessed and an increasingly desperate need to understand it on a more personal level.   As soon as I re-read her post, I started flipping frantically through our readings and then I found it: Jack Mezirow's idea that adult education fosters perspective transformation (Finger and Asun, p. 58).  That's what Waffa did with her post and videolink.  She provided a treasure map to an alternative perspective.  And equally important for me, she affirmed that, no matter what the medium whether it be in a classroom or online, learning is exciting.

With her permission, I’m including Waffa’s post below followed by the video.  Thanks again, Waffa. 

"I am a Muslim- Canadian who wears the headscarf (hijaab). I have lived in Canada all my life but I decided to wear the hijaab permanently 5 years ago. When I decided to wear the hijaab, most people assumed that I was oppressed and I was being forced by my father or brother to wear the hijaab, which is unfortunate because the media portrays that Muslim women are oppressed. Most people don't understand the reason behind the hijaab other than believing what the media says, but a Muslim woman wears the hijaab to guard her chastity and to be modest. A woman shouldn't be seen as a sex object; rather she should be respected for who she is. A woman is like a gem and is precious, therefore she should be protected and protect herself. Music, movies and society have totally degraded a woman's worth. I find it heart breaking when I see young girls dressed so revealing and go on major diets since the music industry promotes that you are beautiful only if you’re skinny. I think most of us women can relate to weight issues and always feeling like we are being judged by our weight or how we dress. Just remember that as a woman, you are beautiful no matter how fat, skinny, tall or short you are. A man should love you for who you are and not how you look."

Why not?

This week we explored the introduction and the first chapter in Teaching to Transgress, by bell hooks.  During these pages, hooks relays her first experiences with education as a “black girl from [a] working-class background” in “the apartheid South” (p. 2).  She tells of black teachers teaching black children with a fervor and commitment more akin to the pulpit than to the classroom.  She says that “teachers worked with and for us to ensure that we would fulfill our intellectual destiny and by so doing uplift the race” (p. 2).  With such a beginning, you would think that the explanation of the latter half of the books title, Education as the Practice of Freedom, would be self-evident.  But as I read further, I came to discover that her message is at once more elemental and universal.  That is to say, you don’t need to suffer institutional oppression to the scale of apartheid to appreciate the liberating effect that education can have on the mind, body and soul. 

hooks writes that “home was the place where I was forced to conform to someone else’s image of who and what I should be.  School was the place where I could forget that self and, through ideas, reinvent myself” (p. 3).  When I read that I thought to myself, “Really?  ‘Cause that ain’t the school I remember.”  I remember a lot of conformity to images, ideas, and methods of doing things.  Yes, there was the odd teacher who, in my formative years, let me be in charge of my formation.  But they seemed to be few and far between in my recollection.  One of those neo-hippie, substitute teachers who wasn't really around all that long but long enough for the regular teacher to ask upon his/her return, "You didn't cover this?"  But then I remembered a specific teacher who taught me the idea that even though school may give you the formula there is no reason why you can’t question it and even design your own.  That teacher was my Dad.

As a senior in high school, my Dad, a high school physics teacher, thought that I would “enjoy” calculus and convinced me to select it as one of my electives.  I enjoyed it so much that I ended up taking it twice.  One day, I brought my calculus homework to my Dad so he could share in my enjoyment.  Never having taught calculus (or at least not in his recent memory), he reviewed my text and the handout from my teacher that detailed the formula to use in order to solve the problem.  Now my Dad is a pretty smart guy and I understand that there is a relationship between calculus and physics (don’t ask me what – I didn’t enjoy it enough to find out).  But, I watched in amazement as my Dad worked out the problem in a different way and said to me, "Why don't you try to solve it like this...".  Until that moment, I hadn't considered that you could "do" calculus a different way than the way that I was taught.  I said to my Dad, "You can't do that".  His response to me: "Why not?" 

I think that what hooks is saying is that the very act of teaching and learning should be liberating; that is to say teaching and learning should not be about memorizing and reciting "facts" but rather, recognizing that fact can be influenced by bias. Teaching and learning should be about questioning, being encouraged to have the stones to say, “Why not look at it this way…”.   Why not, indeed. 

My readings...

Take a peek, if you will, at my "Readings" - just to the right of this post.  This is a list of books that I have been assigned to support my learning in the two courses that I am currently taking online through Brock University.  I should note that I haven't read all of these books but I expect to before the end of the term.  A bit of a challenge for me as I am a notoriously slow reader.  Anyone in my family would attest to this fact.  


I come from and have married into a family of readers.  When a new book enters the family, particularly a good one, it gets circulated throughout all of the members, kind of like a book club with only one book to share.  Well, I'm always the last on the list.  There have even been times when I have received a book as a gift and before I get a chance to crack the spine, it has already been absconded and is in circulation.


Anyway, I'll try to add to this list as time goes on. I'm already thinking about a few....


As an aside, thanks to all of you who have read my first blog and the feedback that I've received.  Again, I welcome your comments.  Just checked my stats today and my blog has had a respectable number of views (although I don't have anything to benchmark that against).  One from Germany even.

My first blog

Okay so this is my first time blogging. My first blog. I should probably give you a bit of background first. Why am I starting to blog and what am I going to blog about? Well, in response to the first question, I'll first direct you to my "About me" section on my blog. There you'll note that I am working towards my degree in adult education at Brock University. I completed all of my core courses nearly 7 years ago. Then, a little more than a year ago I decided to finally complete the rest of my requirements. Well, a lot had changed in my life during my time away from my studies - marriage, mortgage, kids....  And a lot had changed in adult education as well.  In particular, distance education had become more accessible and the options more abundant. 


Case in point: when I took my core courses, the university offered them at a satellite campus close to where I live.  I took all of my courses with the same cohort of learners, meeting every Saturday over a period of more than two years.  When I decided to start working on my electives, the university didn’t have much to choose from in my neck of the woods so, with direction from the academic advisor, I researched my options via Canadian Virtual University.  I ended up taking a traditional distance ed course from Thompson Rivers University.  Fast forward 18 months and now the university offers a number of electives in the adult education stream that are available online.  So, I can sit in the comfort of my own home at 6:30 in the morning enjoying my cup of joe and plug away at my coursework while the kids are happily entertained by the latest exploits of Handy Manny and Dora the Explorer. 


I am currently enrolled in two online courses this fall, having taken my first online course this past spring.  As you can tell, I enjoy the online format.  And it’s not just for the convenience of working in my pj’s. I also find it more challenging than face-to-face learning.  I can’t just read a bit of the chapter, show up to class and fake it.  I actually have to read, reflect, and formulate coherent and credible thoughts before posting them online.  However, my experience with online learning has also highlighted my dismal understanding of the role of technology in adult education. So, after my last online course, I started on a quest to learn more about the technological tools that are out there to facilitate learning.  This (finally) leads me to why I am starting this blog. 


One of the courses that I am currently taking has given us the option of recording our learning journals (if any of you have read anything about adult education, you’ll know we love our journals) in a blog format.  One of the issues that I have had with journaling is having the discipline to persist with it after I finish a course.  My hope is that having a journal that is viewed by others will keep my feet to the fire, so to speak. 


So what will I blog about?  Again, if you are familiar with adult education you know we love critical reflection even more than journaling about it.  So, this blog will often be about my reflections on my course readings and other learning that I experience.  But I expect that it will be more than just my musings about adult education in the global context or power and pedagogy.  As a neophyte to technological tools such as blogging, podcasts and the like, I’ll likely be reflecting upon my experience as an adult learner, exploring these new ways of teaching and learning.  And, if all goes well and I begin to get some feedback, sorry, comments, on my blog, I’ll likely reflect on those as well.